REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

This is circulating today; I found it on The Big Picture blog.

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP

DEAR AMERICAN:

I NEED TO ASK YOU TO SUPPORT AN URGENT SECRET BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH A TRANSFER OF FUNDS OF GREAT MAGNITUDE.

I AM MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY OF THE REPUBLIC OF AMERICA. MY COUNTRY HAS HAD CRISIS THAT HAS CAUSED THE NEED FOR LARGE TRANSFER OF FUNDS OF 800 BILLION DOLLARS US. IF YOU WOULD ASSIST ME IN THIS TRANSFER, IT WOULD BE MOST PROFITABLE TO YOU.

I AM WORKING WITH MR. PHIL GRAM, LOBBYIST FOR UBS, WHO WILL BE MY REPLACEMENT AS MINISTRY OF THE TREASURY IN JANUARY. AS A SENATOR, YOU MAY KNOW HIM AS THE LEADER OF THE AMERICAN BANKING DEREGULATION MOVEMENT IN THE 1990S. THIS TRANSACTIN IS 100% SAFE.

THIS IS A MATTER OF GREAT URGENCY. WE NEED A BLANK CHECK. WE NEED THE FUNDS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. WE CANNOT DIRECTLY TRANSFER THESE FUNDS IN THE NAMES OF OUR CLOSE FRIENDS BECAUSE WE ARE CONSTANTLY UNDER SURVEILLANCE. MY FAMILY LAWYER ADVISED ME THAT I SHOULD LOOK FOR A RELIABLE AND TRUSTWORTHY PERSON WHO WILL ACT AS A NEXT OF KIN SO THE FUNDS CAN BE TRANSFERRED.

PLEASE REPLY WITH ALL OF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT, IRA AND COLLEGE FUND ACCOUNT NUMBERS AND THOSE OF YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN TO WALLSTREETBAILOUT@TREASURY.GOV SO THAT WE MAY TRANSFER YOUR COMMISSION FOR THIS TRANSACTION. AFTER I RECEIVE THAT INFORMATION, I WILL RESPOND WITH DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT SAFEGUARDS THAT WILL BE USED TO PROTECT THE FUNDS.

YOURS FAITHFULLY MINISTER OF TREASURY PAULSON

Comrades,

I realize I'm no economist, and I just dabble on financial blogs, so can someone help me out here? How does any bailout plan do anything but delay the inevitable? It's my understanding that if this plan passes, the banks face very little moral risk. What's to prevent these smart investment bankers, once the current crisis has passed (IF this bailout plan works), from developing more creative investments, knowing that any risk is now socialized, and leading us down the same path again?

Our economy has to have cycles; the enormous credit bubble has to pop sometime. Doesn't delaying it just increase the size of the recession/depression in our future? No one in power has been willing to give any opinion on exactly how bad the consequences might be if we let the natural economic cycle run its course. Are we so addicted to credit that we can't see the need to let the cycle run its course and take a lifestyle hit in order to save our nation's long-term viability?

I've been listening to Paulson's testimony a bit, and it's just scary. No specifics, no oversight, just give us a blank check NOW and stop asking questions. We have to slow this down and ask MORE questions.

3 Comments:

Mas Triste said...

I wonder what happened to being estatic with 10% returns annually?

BobbyWC said...

"How does any bailout plan do anything but delay the inevitable?"

It is time to let it collapse. I grow so bored with the Republicans always yelling the financial markets cannot be held accountable because they are the back bone of America.

The people are the backbone. When it collapses we will be relieved of the financial debt created by these endless schemes.

It started with Clinton and the various state governors who allowed credit card interest rates to go higher than 18%. Credit had no where to go. Those who could afford it were maxed out. So they had to expand it by going to those who could not. The excange was higher interests rates.

Bush continued the credit expansion as the only way to grow the economy. The mortgage crisis was next.

Let the entire system die. The only thing I might consider is allowing bankruptcy judges to reset the mortage payment on a temporary basis. This will prevent foreclosures, which in turn will help prevent a further reduction in property taxes which are collectable.

Bobby WC

Anonymous said...

Nice Blog - I was pleased to add it to my site. I can't support the bailout as much as known at this moment. However a few years back the Resolution Trust solution seems similar and I believe profitable in the end. It seems to be going to happen despite the public distaste, so I pray this does it. This what happens when the government uses Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a social engineering tool - "affordable housing"